The Question

What existing evidence exists regarding the impact of Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY)—a government-run health insurance program for the poor in India? How reliable is the existing evidence and what biases and limitations are present in the studies?  Can we effectively assess the program with the available evidence?

What we found

We found that amongst the studies that currently exist, information is incomplete or lacking on evaluation of the program. Existing studies are observational, and it is difficult to arrive at causal conclusions based on such data. Some studies have conflicting reports, such as on the correlation between insurance use and out-of-pocket health expenditures. A few randomized design health insurance studies have begun in India, with the potential to assess RSBY. These could be useful, though there are also inherent limitations in such studies as well.

We argue that RSBY still needs to be rigorously evaluated for its impacts. The future of the program can’t depend on just a few studies that disagree with each other and don’t use a randomized controlled design.

Why it matters

The potential for RSBY or an RSBY-like scheme is enormous as the need to improve health outcomes and decrease financial shocks is great. But without sufficient evidence, we can’t know whether the scheme works or how it could be adjusted to make it work best.
RSBY’s impacts are limited by inefficiencies—such as lack of administrative data, the long-term sustainability of the scheme, and problems with frauds and other inconsistencies. Successful evaluations of the program should address these, and offer information on the degree to which they effect the program, to potentially offer information on how to improve it.